Stop hunting for files
Search one library instead of checking six drives, four project folders and someone's memory. Everything the team has ever shot is in one place and findable.
One searchable library for every frame your team has ever shot. Ingest, metadata, transcode and workflow tracking run themselves, and FLOW AI reads the footage so even an unlogged archive becomes findable.
If you came here looking for software to cut in, this is not that, and it is better to know now than twenty minutes into a call.
Editors keep the tools they already know. FLOW handles everything that happens around the edit, which is where the hours actually go.
Panels sit inside Adobe Premiere Pro, and it works alongside After Effects, Photoshop, Autodesk Flame, Lightworks and EDIUS.
Three things change in the first week, and they are the three that eat your team's day.
Search one library instead of checking six drives, four project folders and someone's memory. Everything the team has ever shot is in one place and findable.
Media comes in, gets named, gets metadata, gets transcoded and lands where editorial expects it. Nobody sits there doing it by hand at 7pm.
See what is shot, logged, cut and delivered without chasing anyone for a status update.
And the part most tools cannot do: FLOW AI can analyse existing archives, making years of previously unlogged footage searchable.
New ingest and the existing archive, both. Nothing has to be re-encoded or moved first.
Naming, metadata, transcode presets and routing. Written down once, applied every time after that.
Editors search the library in plain language and pull what they need. No prep queue, no request ticket, no waiting on a media manager.
"FLOW has removed the operational complexity, allowing our colourists to focus entirely on the creative side of the job."
"EditShare offers us better workflows with less human time and more automation."
"EditShare has completely transformed our conform workflows."
[NEEDS INPUT] Headshots and logo clearance, owner Katharine. Quotes are text-only until then.
Plenty of asset management systems handle files perfectly well, right up until the files are video. Three reasons they come apart:
DAMs typically focus on managing and distributing finished digital assets. MAMs are purpose-built for time-based media and production workflows, with capabilities such as proxies, transcoding, metadata and NLE integration. FLOW AI adds search inside the footage itself.
And the honest other direction: if video arrives finished, nobody searches inside it, and your problem is which assets are approved for use, a DAM is the right call and a MAM is an expensive way to solve a problem you do not have.
Repeatable metadata and naming rules so assets stay organized past the point anyone could keep in their head.
Proxies, deliverables and review copies come out of a preset instead of somebody setting up a queue by hand each time.
FLOW sits next to EFS, so media management is part of the storage rather than bolted on beside it.
On-premise, cloud and hybrid, without forcing every team in the building into the same model.
Part of the wider EditShare platform, which cuts the handoffs between separate systems. Works alongside Adobe Premiere Pro, After Effects and Photoshop, Autodesk Flame, Lightworks and EDIUS.
Editors, media managers and production leaders, not IT. The people who lose the hours are the people it is designed around.
Teams evaluating FLOW are usually also looking at iconik, Sony Ci, Primestream, Dalet Flex, IPV Curator or Mimir. Serious video teams need three things stacked, and the gap is almost always in the layer nobody demos.
| The three layers | EditShare FLOW | The alternative |
|---|---|---|
| A single scalable namespace | One searchable media library across EFS and supported third-party storage, with EFS scaling from 32TB to 20PB+. | Ask them |
| Security and reliability | Media stays online through a drive failure, with RAID 6 per node and XOR protection across multi-node clusters. | Ask them |
| Workflow and automation | Ingest, naming, metadata, transcode and routing on rules you set once. | Ask them |
| Search inside the footage | FLOW AI reads faces, logos, on-screen text, speech and scenes across new and existing media. | Ask them |
| Pricing model | Bought as part of the platform rather than per seat. On-premise is a purchase, FLEX on AWS is a subscription, FLOW AI is subscription only. | Ask them |
Every claim in the EditShare column is one we can show you running. We have deliberately not filled the other column in rather than put words in a competitor's mouth: put whoever you are weighing us against in it, and we will go through it line by line on the call.
Organizing, searching and moving media through production from one managed library, instead of leaving it spread across drives, project folders and cloud accounts.
No. FLOW does not replace the application your editors cut in. It handles everything around the edit: getting media in, prepared, organized and moved on.
DAMs typically focus on managing and distributing finished digital assets. MAMs are purpose-built for time-based media and production workflows: proxies, transcoding, metadata and NLE integration. FLOW AI adds search inside the footage itself.
FLOW AI is licensed separately from FLOW as an annual subscription and requires dedicated GPU-enabled FLOW AI infrastructure.
It depends on how much media you hold, how many people touch it, and whether you run on-premise, in the cloud or both. FLOW is bought as part of the platform rather than per seat, so a list price would be misleading. Bring your capacity and headcount to the demo and you will leave with a real number instead of a range.
Yes, and this is the part most tools cannot do. FLOW AI detects faces and people, logos and brands, on-screen text, spoken words as full transcripts, and scenes and objects, and it can analyse your existing archive so older footage becomes searchable.
No, and anyone promising that is overselling. It removes the bulk logging work. Teams still add the editorial and rights metadata only a person can judge.
Bring the platform you are on now to the demo. What decides the effort is how your metadata is structured and what your current system will export, and that is the first thing we look at rather than something we guess at afterwards.
The software is not the slow part. The rules take as long to define as your process is complicated, and most of that time goes on deciding what the process actually is. We walk your ingest and delivery steps on the demo and give you a timeline for your setup rather than a generic one.
On-premise EditShare is bought outright rather than rented, so the hardware stays yours. FLEX, which is EditShare on AWS, runs as a subscription, and FLOW AI is subscription only. Which combination fits depends on how you want to carry the cost, and we go through that on the demo.
No. FLOW manages media on EditShare storage and on third-party storage, and FLOW AI indexes either. The only requirement is that FLOW can reach the media and make a proxy of it. Search and automation do get better over one library, which is why teams tend to consolidate eventually, but it is not a condition of starting.
Yes. Bring your own archive and the 30 minutes is spent searching it, not watching a canned demo reel.
30 minutes, your workflow, straight answers. Book the slot on the same page.
FLOW sits behind the tools your team already opens, so the library changes and the way people work does not.